|
|
Q & A
Question Sorting on
Total Questions926
A private company has husband and wife as only two directors as well as shareholders. There is no other shareholder. Husband is co
Read More
A private company has husband and wife as only two directors as well as shareholders. There is no other shareholder. Husband is continuing as a whole time director since 1996 as there was no fixed tenure in his appointment letter. The questions now are :1. Does the Company need to reappoint him with a tenure of 5 years now ? If yes, can he be reappointed now say. in December, 2014 or January, 2015 ? 2. Whether in respect of the Board resolution for his reappointment and remuneration, Section 184 and Section 188 apply ? 3. Will he compulsorily be treated as a KMP ? 4. Whether MR 1 in this case will be filed within 60 days from Board resolution or from General meeting resolution ( as the general meeting will now only be in September, 2015) ?
- Views (3299)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2554)
- Posted By: Nava bharat ventures limited 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2251)
- Posted By: Atul 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1847)
- Posted By: Latha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2181)
- Posted By: Khushboo 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2531)
- Posted By: Mookambika r 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1934)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1818)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1758)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2673)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2619)
- Posted By: Nilesh patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2328)
- Posted By: Ravinder 10 year(s) ago
|
I LEFT A COMPANY IN THE MONTH OF APRIL 2008 AND AT PRESENT I AM WORKING AS A PRACTICING COMPANY SECRETARY. THE COMPANY HAS NOT FIL
Read More
I LEFT A COMPANY IN THE MONTH OF APRIL 2008 AND AT PRESENT I AM WORKING AS A PRACTICING COMPANY SECRETARY. THE COMPANY HAS NOT FILED FORM 32 OF MY CESSATION AND MY NAME IS APPEARING IN THE LIST OF SIGNATORIES ON MCA MASTER DATA. THE COMPANY HAS NOT FILED ANNUAL RETURN FROM THE YEAR 2007 TO 2015. ROC HAS LAUNCHED A PROSECUTION IN THE COURT AND I HAVE ALSO BEEN ARRAYED AS AN ACCUSED. NOW, PLEASE ADVISE ON FOLLOWING- 1. HOW MY NAME WILL BE REMOVED FROM MCA MASTER DATA AS I AM IN PRACTICE AND FORM 32/DIR-12 CAN NOT BE FILED. 2. HOW CAN I DEFEND MYSELF IN THE COURT.
- Views (2031)
- Posted By: Ravinder 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2140)
- Posted By: Latha 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2246)
- Posted By: Madhu 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2325)
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2294)
- Posted By: Rachna gupta singh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2239)
- Posted By: Ketan antani 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1993)
- Posted By: Ketan antani 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1860)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2513)
- Posted By: Vandana bhatia 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1973)
- Posted By: Hardam singh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2088)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2519)
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2762)
- Posted By: Shairill a. dubey 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2081)
- Posted By: Naresh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2421)
- Posted By: Gopika m n 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1922)
- Posted By: Gurpreet kaur 8 year(s) ago
|
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one offi
Read More
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one office of the Company as CEO who is not a Director of the Company. Kindly clarify the following :-
01. Will he term and considered as KMP in term of Provision of Section 2(51) of the Act ?
02. Will he termed and considered as officer in default in terms of Provision of section 2(60) of the Act ?
03. Whether the Company require to File Form DIR-12 in respect of his appointment as CEO ?
04. Is it mandatory to disclose details of appointment of such CEO in Board’s Report in terms of section 134 (3)(q) read with sub-rule 5 of rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2015 ?
04. Is it mandatory to sign Financial Statements by him in terms of section 134(1) of the Act ?
- Views (3063)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 7 year(s) ago
|
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one offi
Read More
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one office of the Company as CEO who is not a Director of the Company. Kindly clarify the following :-
01. Will he term and considered as KMP in term of Provision of Section 2(51) of the Act ?
02. Will he termed and considered as officer in default in terms of Provision of section 2(60) of the Act ?
03. Whether the Company require to File Form DIR-12 in respect of his appointment as CEO ?
04. Is it mandatory to disclose details of appointment of such CEO in Board’s Report in terms of section 134 (3)(q) read with sub-rule 5 of rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2015 ?
04. Is it mandatory to sign Financial Statements by him in terms of section 134(1) of the Act ?
- Views (3164)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1714)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1914)
- Posted By: Ketan antani 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1961)
- Posted By: Nitin 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1775)
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2105)
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 11 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (3442)
- Posted By: Genicon 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5419)
- Posted By: Zaeem 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3878)
- Posted By: Palani kumar b 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4941)
- Posted By: Pramod prabhudesai 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (12065)
- Posted By: Genicon 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5218)
- Posted By: Mukund govindharajan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3383)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3102)
- Posted By: Sahil 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3381)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3387)
- Posted By: Deepti vohra 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2783)
- Posted By: Kishore p shah 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2861)
- Posted By: Abhinaya 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4295)
- Posted By: V. subramanian 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3623)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3351)
- Posted By: Latha 12 year(s) ago
|
The Companies Act 2013, provides for voting by electronic means by shareholders at general meeting - Section 108. Draft Rules 7.18
Read More
The Companies Act 2013, provides for voting by electronic means by shareholders at general meeting - Section 108. Draft Rules 7.18 1 specifies that listed companies and companies with more than 500 shareholders may provide for electronic voting for section 108. Under Companies Act 1956, the Circular 72/2011 dt 27.12.2011 under Green Initiative provides it is optional for companies to provide for share holders participation at general meetings through video conferencing. There is no such mention of participation of shareholders through video conferencing at general meetings in the Companies Act 2013 and draft rules. Does that mean that the option of video conferencing facility for share holders participation in general meetings is dropped under Companies Act 2013.Hence can it be concluded that under Companies Act 2013 even as an option the company can no more provide video conferencing facility to share holders for participation in General Meetings. [by. G Mukund]
- Views (9785)
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3136)
- Posted By: Priyadarshini 12 year(s) ago
|
Dear Sir/ Madam, Ref: Section 186 and Explanation to Rule no 13 (1) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 20
Read More
Dear Sir/ Madam, Ref: Section 186 and Explanation to Rule no 13 (1) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014) According to me, we can investment, give loan etc ....exceeding limits ...........but we have to pass special resolution with in 1 year from the notification of these rules. It means if limits are 10 Cr .....my current borrowing is 12 cr.....I can further borrow to say 20 cr ( with out passing special resolution immediately).... but have to take approval for the same by 31.03.2015. Kindly provided your inputs. Thanks, Mandar
- Views (3158)
- Posted By: Mandar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2793)
- Posted By: Arpita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3278)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 11 year(s) ago
|
Sir Please advise me: Query 1: A Pvt ltd is to be converted in to LLP. Whether Board Resolution by the Pvt ltd co. is sufficient
Read More
Sir Please advise me: Query 1: A Pvt ltd is to be converted in to LLP. Whether Board Resolution by the Pvt ltd co. is sufficient for Conversion in to LLP or Extraordinary general meeting is further required to be conducted for the conversion? Query 2: E-form 18 under LLP act requires to obtain the Consent from Shareholders of the pvt ltd for conversion. Whether Simple consent by Shareholders by way of letter is sufficient or calling EGM is needed? Query 3: Whether MGT- 14 form is needed to be filed in both the above mentioned queries ? Thanking You With Regards
- Views (3018)
- Posted By: Kamal 12 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (3652)
- Posted By: Anjali 13 year(s) ago
|
A Company is required to spend say Rs.10 on CSR in the FY 2014-15. The amount of Rs.10 is based on 2 of average PBT of the FY 2011
Read More
A Company is required to spend say Rs.10 on CSR in the FY 2014-15. The amount of Rs.10 is based on 2 of average PBT of the FY 2011:12, 2012:13 and 2013:14. In the FY 2014:15, the Company actually spent Rs.5 on the CSR projects identified by it and Rs.3 will be spent on the same projects in the next FY, leaving Rs.2 not to be spent by it. The Board also gives reasons for not spending Rs.2 to its shareholders. With this background, my Question is –How Companies will record the amount under CSR Pool, as it is not in the nature of “Reserve”, which can be brought back to Profit. In the given case, where the amount i.e. Rs.2 not spent will go. As per the Draft CSR Rules, surplus arising out of the CSR activity will not be part of business profits of the company. | By. DS Mahajan
- Views (3572)
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3475)
- Posted By: Chandra 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3675)
- Posted By: V.b. mahajan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5361)
- Posted By: Sanjay dewan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3671)
- Posted By: Pradeep panda 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3830)
- Posted By: Mukund govindharajan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3368)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3707)
- Posted By: Pooja hiranandani 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3486)
- Posted By: Pawan 11 year(s) ago
|
Rule 2f of the CSR Rules, 2014 provides meaning of the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in accordan
Read More
Rule 2f of the CSR Rules, 2014 provides meaning of the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act, but shall not include the following, namely:—
ii any dividend received from other companies in India, which are covered under and complying with the provisions of section 135 of the Act:
Here I wish to know that any dividend received would be deducted from profit before tax or dividend is to be deducted of only those declaring cos which are covered under Section 135 of the Act. If yes to second option, whether disclosure of reason in Directors Report of not complying CSR liability shall be considered as compliance for the purpose of these rules.
- Views (2892)
- Posted By: Rakesh jain 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3265)
- Posted By: Sanjay solanki 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3276)
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4423)
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3147)
- Posted By: Dharmesh dixit 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3237)
- Posted By: Manoj kumar singh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4677)
- Posted By: Hardam singh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3172)
- Posted By: Ramnik bhimani 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3599)
- Posted By: Kamlesh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3178)
- Posted By: Lalitha kannan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3008)
- Posted By: Gagandeep singh 12 year(s) ago
|
Based on MCA circular 8/2014 and CSR rules, the CSR reporting in the directors report will not be applicable to a Company which ha
Read More
Based on MCA circular 8/2014 and CSR rules, the CSR reporting in the directors report will not be applicable to a Company which has FY Jan – Dec 2014. The query is, are these companies whose FY have started prior to Apr 2014 required to spend any CSR budget in their FY 2014? Even if they spend, there is no reporting in their directors report for FY 2014. Query 2 is – Suppose a company is required to spend Rs.100 in a particular FY, was able to spend just Rs.60. The requirement is that Company shall give details of Rs.60 spent and the reason for not spending Rs.40 in the CSR report in the directors report. What will happen to Rs.40 that is unspent? Will it goes back to the business of the Company or needs to be spent in succeeding years. Please clarify with relevant provisions.
- Views (3218)
- Posted By: Vijayamahantesh khannur 12 year(s) ago
|
|
The companies act states that preferential allotment shall also be treated as private placement and will have to comply with the r
Read More
The companies act states that preferential allotment shall also be treated as private placement and will have to comply with the requirements of private placements like issue of letter of offer, valuation by registered valuer etc. In case of preferential allotment of shares or other convertible securities to the promoters, should the company issue letter of offer and comply with the other requirements like valuation. With regard to the special resolution to be passed, can the company pass a single resolution with an upper limit so that the resolution can be used for all allotments to be made during the next 12 months. I understand that the special resolution should be acted upon within 12 months. Can a price band be fixed with power to the board to determine the price. In case of price band, how would the post issue shareholding pattern be made. Only when the exact price of share is known, can the number of shares to be alloted be determined. Please advice.
- Views (4575)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3357)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3009)
- Posted By: Nitin 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2988)
- Posted By: Reena 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4334)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3679)
- Posted By: Vishal arora 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3214)
- Posted By: Cs anuj solanki 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3273)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3301)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3221)
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3162)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3205)
- Posted By: Nirupama v 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3469)
- Posted By: Lakshminarayana n 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3602)
- Posted By: Jainam shah 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3482)
- Posted By: Vishal arora 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3369)
- Posted By: Prerna 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3359)
- Posted By: Ujjwal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3591)
- Posted By: Alok 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3353)
- Posted By: Ravi 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3154)
- Posted By: Sapna tomar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3180)
- Posted By: Revathy` 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (19022)
- Posted By: Ravi 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3201)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2932)
- Posted By: K gopalan 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3633)
- Posted By: Comsec 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3613)
- Posted By: Ramesh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3477)
- Posted By: Kejal shah 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3829)
- Posted By: Reena 12 year(s) ago
|
A private company having an authorised capital of Rs. 2 Crores wish to takeover the business of a partnership firm. In that firm b
Read More
A private company having an authorised capital of Rs. 2 Crores wish to takeover the business of a partnership firm. In that firm both the partners hv contributed 75 lacs each as their capital contribution. i.e Rs.1.50 Cr.The company proposes to issue equity shares to both the partners at par i.e issue of 1500000 shares of Rs.10/- each. As the company is not getting hard cash at the time of allotment,this shares will be issued for consideration other than cash. My query is about what option is to be selected for point no 4 (iv) of the form PAS 3, consideration received is (a)- assets and property acquired or (b)- Goodwill or (d)-Conversion of loan or (e) any other and write against capital contributed in firm.Further how this allotment will take place. Are we require to follow the whole private placement procedure.
- Views (3080)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3259)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3034)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4519)
- Posted By: P banerjee 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3339)
- Posted By: Haryana 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3156)
- Posted By: Dhananjay 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4593)
- Posted By: Piyush 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3001)
- Posted By: Reena 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2665)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3332)
- Posted By: Reena 12 year(s) ago
|
Rule 14(2) (a) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 provides that A company shall not make a privat
Read More
Rule 14(2) (a) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 provides that A company shall not make a private placement of its securities unless the proposed offer of securities or invitation to subscribe securities has been previously approved by the shareholders of the company, by a Special Resolution, for each of the Offers or Invitations:Provided that in the explanatory statement annexed to the notice for the general meeting the basis or justification for the price (including premium, if any) at which the offer or invitation is being made shall be disclosedProvided further that in case of offer or invitation for non-convertible debentures, it shall be sufficient if the company passes a previous special resolution only once in a year for all the offers or invitation for such debentures during the year.In the Companies Act 2013 YEAR has not been defined. Further section 2 (95) provides that words and expressions used and not defined in this Act but defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 or the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or the Depositories Act, 1996 shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in those Acts.The word YEAR has also not been defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 or the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or the Depositories Act, 1996.Considering the above, views are sought if the approval of shareholders under the second proviso to Rule 14(2) (a) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 needs to be taken on Financial year (defined in Companies Act 2013) basis or the said approval of shareholders can be taken on AGM to AGM basis or on calendar year basis.:
- Views (2905)
- Posted By: Manohar balwani 12 year(s) ago
|
THis is in connection with issue and allotment of shares to a foreign parent co under new Act. FEMA requires shares to be issued a
Read More
THis is in connection with issue and allotment of shares to a foreign parent co under new Act. FEMA requires shares to be issued at fair value certified by auditors. Also, Section 62 of the new Act requires that issue of shares should be at value determined by the registered valuer. In one case, the value of share is around Rs. 1.2 whereas the face value is Rs. 10. Section 53 of the Act prohibits issue of shares at discount. We are confused. If the issue is in accordance with Section 62, i e at Rs. 1.2, there will be a violation of section 53. Is there any conceptual misunderstanding By Hina Sadrani, Self Employed
- Views (3834)
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3283)
- Posted By: Chirag shah 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3295)
- Posted By: Cs ram thakkar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3140)
- Posted By: Cs ram thakkar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3091)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3312)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
One company has pass special resolution u/s. 42 read with 62 with relevant rules under provisions of Co. Act, 2013 for offer, issu
Read More
One company has pass special resolution u/s. 42 read with 62 with relevant rules under provisions of Co. Act, 2013 for offer, issue of and allotment of Shares of Rs. 5 Crores to 120 persons in one or more tranches and as per the provisions of act and rules the validity of resolution is 12 months from the date of passing of resolution. The Board of Directors have approved Letter of offer in Form PAS4 and send the same first to 42 persons out of 120 persons ? We want following clarifications : 01. What is validity of Private Placement offer Letter in Form PAS4. ? 30 days or 12 months. 02. The company send offer letter to first 42 persons and made allotment and then we want to send offer letter to another 45 person out of 120 person, should the company need to prepare and approved offer letter in Form PAS -4 again and again until the completion of allotment for the total shares for which special resolution passed ? 03. Whether company need to maintain record in Form PAS 5 again and again when the company send Offer to total 120 persons until completion of allotment of total shares under special resolution passed ?
- Views (3985)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2772)
- Posted By: Piyush 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3001)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3287)
- Posted By: Vishal arora 12 year(s) ago
|
If a company hold an EOGM to approve the offer of shares u/s 42 & 62 and file MGT-14 within 30 days and then call board meeting ne
Read More
If a company hold an EOGM to approve the offer of shares u/s 42 & 62 and file MGT-14 within 30 days and then call board meeting next month and issue offer letter, F-GNL-2 with PAS-4 is to be filed within 30 days of this board meeting but Form GNL-2 asks for the EOGM date only. How should we file PAS-4 issued in the board meeting held after EOGM? I we enter the details of MGT-14 and date of EOGM in point 5 of the form then point 8 automatically filled up with the same date. But in fact the two dates are different. The PAS 4 is issued in the Board meeting after one month of the EOGM and if we file the form with EOGM date it will be late obviously and otherwise also it is not correct. PAS4 is to be filed within 30 days of its issue date.Can anybody help if they hv filed this form? itis urgent.
- Views (2895)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3836)
- Posted By: Anshul mittal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2888)
- Posted By: Radhika 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4031)
- Posted By: Mohan srinivasan 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2932)
- Posted By: Haryana 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5194)
- Posted By: Vikram 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3019)
- Posted By: Vinay b l 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2948)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar singla 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2854)
- Posted By: Revathy` 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3088)
- Posted By: Sapna tomar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2585)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3047)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2972)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4202)
- Posted By: Hardam singh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3784)
- Posted By: Rajapanduranga 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2447)
- Posted By: Cs rohit 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4484)
- Posted By: Shrenik 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4698)
- Posted By: Shrenik 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3392)
- Posted By: Satish kshirsagar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3127)
- Posted By: Aishwarya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3002)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4321)
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2833)
- Posted By: Gowri 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3379)
- Posted By: Ramnik bhimani 11 year(s) ago
|
|
|
|
- Views (7542)
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3172)
- Posted By: Monika bhardwaj 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3574)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1848)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3982)
- Posted By: Venkatesh babu t r 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (27784)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2123)
- Posted By: Vijay shankar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2350)
- Posted By: Kamlsh tripathi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2246)
- Posted By: Kamal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3098)
- Posted By: Vishwaradhya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1940)
- Posted By: P k krishnamurthy 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2944)
- Posted By: Haryana 11 year(s) ago
|
A Person wants to Transfer its shares in an unlisted public company, registered office of which is situated at Nagpur and both Tra
Read More
A Person wants to Transfer its shares in an unlisted public company, registered office of which is situated at Nagpur and both Transferor and Transferee blong toPanipat ,a city in Haryana and they will execute the Form SH-4 in Panipat only. Under which act Stamp Duty will be paid Maharashtra or Haryana??. If maharashtra how will they purchase Share Transfer Stamp as they both are based in haryana. and How will Market Price of shares be calculated, as stamp on share transfer is .25 % on Consideration Paid or Market Price of the Shares , whichever is higher?.
- Views (2203)
- Posted By: Mahak 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2306)
- Posted By: Latha 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2716)
- Posted By: Revati galgali 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (6008)
- Posted By: Comsec 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2880)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (6844)
- Posted By: Rajeesh kumar c 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1745)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1766)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1888)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1817)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1972)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2049)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2037)
- Posted By: Bharat 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4355)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3482)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2031)
- Posted By: Sandhya 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1790)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (8457)
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2358)
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2568)
- Posted By: Charu khatri 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1837)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2047)
- Posted By: Vandana bhatia 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2175)
- Posted By: Ravi kiran 11 year(s) ago
|
SHARE TRANSFER - Share Transfer Deed exceuted in 2000 by transferor & Tranferee. The shares was delisted from Stock Exchange for 7
Read More
SHARE TRANSFER - Share Transfer Deed exceuted in 2000 by transferor & Tranferee. The shares was delisted from Stock Exchange for 7-8 years. Now the company again listed with stock exchange. The Transfer deed executed in 2000 is valid OR not now for Transfer of Shares. As per the Companies Act, 2013 Transfer deed is not required to authenticate by ROC. The MCA has clarified regarding transfer of shares and validity of transfer deed vide Circular No. 19/2014 dated 12.06.2014.
Presently, SH 4 is not required to authenticate by ROC. Pls. clarify FORM 7B executed in 2000 will be required re-validate by ROC. OR the company will accept the same FORM 7B for transfer of shares.
- Views (2080)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2152)
- Posted By: Kejal shah 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2108)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 11 year(s) ago
|
Please clarify regarding Issue of Shares:
1. A Pvt. Ltd. company dealing in Multi media business
2.The remittance received in
Read More
Please clarify regarding Issue of Shares:
1. A Pvt. Ltd. company dealing in Multi media business
2.The remittance received in US$ in August 2013.
3. The company has given declaration to the bank on receiving of remittance – the remittance is received as investment by NRI on non repatriation basis.
4. The company has accounted above amount as Unsecured Loan in its Books of accounts.
5. Now, the company desire to convert Unsecured Loan into Equity Shares.
6. Please clarify:
Can the company issue Equity shares on conversion of unsecured Loan?
If yes What are the formalities need to comply?
- Views (1757)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2132)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1880)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2197)
- Posted By: Harpreet 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1565)
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2106)
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1963)
- Posted By: Amruta tendulkar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3279)
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (6323)
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2346)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2149)
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2070)
- Posted By: Rajeesh kumar c 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2603)
- Posted By: P t joseph 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3260)
- Posted By: Aishwarya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2542)
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2089)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3823)
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1848)
- Posted By: B.basu 10 year(s) ago
|
In Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting,
Audit, Transfer and Refund) Amendment Rules, 2017, in Rule 6(3)(
Read More
In Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting,
Audit, Transfer and Refund) Amendment Rules, 2017, in Rule 6(3)(d) , in case where shares are held in physical form under (iv) the following is given
' after issue of duplicate share certificates, the company shall inform the depository by way
of corporate action to convert the duplicate share certificates into DEMAT form and transfer
in favour of the Authority.'
Query:
An unlisted company which has not registered with any depository for holding shares in demat form and hence has not given option to share holders to hold shares in demat form and all shares are held in physical form,
In the above case, for complying with IEPF Rules as per Rule 6(3)(d)(iv) in order to transfer unclaimed shares to IEPF, should the company has to compulsorily get themselves registered with a depository and offer its entire shares the option to hold in demat form and then transfer such of those unclaimed shares from physical to demat form to the credit of IEPF authority.
Also as per Rule 7
(4) After verification of the entitlement of the claimant-
(b) to the shares claimed, the Authority shall issue a refund sanction order with the approval of the Competent Authority and shall credit the shares to the DEMAT account of the claimant to the extent of the claimant’s entitlement.
Query:
When the shares of the unlisted company itself is not demat form and company has not offered such facility to shareholders, how the claimant shareholder can hold shares refunded by the Authority in demat account.
Requesting your goodself to please clarify
- Views (1566)
- Posted By: Mukund govindharajan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2266)
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1864)
- Posted By: Vaidyanathan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3404)
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1903)
- Posted By: Avijit 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1551)
- Posted By: Aishwarya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3012)
- Posted By: Rohit 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1678)
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2242)
- Posted By: Sayed mahmood alam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1895)
- Posted By: Viral sanghavi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2210)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2004)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2010)
- Posted By: Venkatesan 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1538)
- Posted By: Sonam 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1532)
- Posted By: Sonam 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1923)
- Posted By: Sonam 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1922)
- Posted By: Sonam 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1994)
- Posted By: Sonam 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2174)
- Posted By: Sonam 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1986)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
Dear Group Members:- Request for provide your views for the below matter :- Roc has filed the case in reference of prosecution un
Read More
Dear Group Members:- Request for provide your views for the below matter :- Roc has filed the case in reference of prosecution under section 162 (1), 220 (3) against the company in April 2008 , The Hon'ble CJM COURT, ALIPORE has been stated in the order on 15.09.2014 as The case is withdrawn u/s 257 of CRPC. Is there any need for company to file INC 28 ( form 21 - 1956), if yes then what is the time limit for the same, and as still company has not filed the same what will be steps for the same. If no then why still in master data the same is showing in Prosecution details, company have already send the hard copy to ROC by registered post. In the light of Decision / order of Hon'ble CJM COURT, ALIPORE as stated above company approached the MCA also and from there company got reply "Please contact ROC on this.We are not authorized to do so." Request to guide the same.
- Views (2153)
- Posted By: Nitn mehta 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1990)
- Posted By: Aravind 11 year(s) ago
|
In case of companies other thn small companies and all public companies the form AOC-4 and MGT-7 required to be certified by the p
Read More
In case of companies other thn small companies and all public companies the form AOC-4 and MGT-7 required to be certified by the professionals. My query is that when we hv some qualifications on the workings of any company like mostly in case of section 188 all the companies are showing that the related transaction are at arm length and so section 188 does not apply. but if we hv some qualification or on that or on compliance of any other section then how do we register or mark our qualification? By certifying the form we are certifying that the company has complied with all the compliance.
- Views (1876)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1605)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2415)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2115)
- Posted By: K k arora 11 year(s) ago
|
A private limited company was incorporated in fy 2011-2012 but till date that company has not complied any of the roc compliances.
Read More
A private limited company was incorporated in fy 2011-2012 but till date that company has not complied any of the roc compliances. Now the owner of the company wishes to comply all roc compliances and has agreed to pay additional fee as well for form submission. My questions are
1) For the fys 2011-12, 12-13 and 13-14 Whether all compliances shall be as per the companies act 1956 or 2013? kindly refer section, circular or notification in support of answer.
2) After incorporation auditor was appointed for the FY 2011-2012 but no compliance was made thereafter. What shall be the procedure for appointment of auditor for FY 12-13 & 13-14 other than the retiring auditor?
- Views (2005)
- Posted By: Subhash bhaskar 11 year(s) ago
|
*Conversion of Loan into capital[Sec 62(3)* Sec 62(3) states if company takes a loan on the term that loan will be converted int
Read More
*Conversion of Loan into capital[Sec 62(3)* Sec 62(3) states if company takes a loan on the term that loan will be converted into share capital & such an option have been approved before raising of loan by a special resolution, subscribed capital can be increased. *Procedure for conversion of loan into shares:* i. Approve terms of loan by passing special resolution before taking of loan & file special resolution in E-Form MGT14 within 30 days. ii. Convert loan into shares by passing resolution in Board Meeting & File Eform PAS3 for allotment of shares within 30 days. iii. Also issue share certificate by passing Board resolution & file Eform MGT 14 within 30 days for issue of shares. My query: Can we convert Loan taken by a company before the commencement of the CA, 2013 to shares and file pas-3 form?
- Views (5373)
- Posted By: Kamal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1737)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2123)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1931)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3055)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3546)
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1911)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1988)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (2499)
- Posted By: Ruchi mitra 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2873)
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2164)
- Posted By: M b s agarwal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2781)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2117)
- Posted By: Balachandran 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2716)
- Posted By: U l basak & co. 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2318)
- Posted By: Ca.kousik ghosh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1907)
- Posted By: D singh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2478)
- Posted By: M b s agarwal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3730)
- Posted By: Revati galgali 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3716)
- Posted By: Z khan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1890)
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2336)
- Posted By: U l basak & co. 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2172)
- Posted By: Hitender tanwar 12 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (7353)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2211)
- Posted By: Chnadravijayshah 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3938)
- Posted By: Palani kumar b 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2134)
- Posted By: Shekhar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2011)
- Posted By: Shekhar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1702)
- Posted By: U l basak & co. 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1882)
- Posted By: Ca.kousik ghosh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2010)
- Posted By: Rr 11 year(s) ago
|
|
Company “A” Limited has appointed as an additional director to fulfill the requirement of number of Independent Directors as requi
Read More
Company “A” Limited has appointed as an additional director to fulfill the requirement of number of Independent Directors as required under the Companies Act, 2013 and listing agreement with Stock Exchanges. The appointment of said additional director would be approved as an Independent Director in the next Annual General Meeting of the Company as required under section 150(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. In this connection the following queries are to be considered :- i) What will be the category of additional director for the intervening period i.e. from the date of appointment as an additional director till the next Annual General Meeting whether he will be independent or professional; ii) Whether the Board has power to appoint independent director and accordingly whether we can categorize such additional director as independent director in the Form DIR12 to be filed on appointment of directors; iii) If such additional director is to be treated as an independent director from the date of which he was appointed as an additional director then whether the intervening period from the date of appointment as an additional director till the next general meeting of the Company would be counted for the purpose of two terms of upto five consecutive years each as mentioned in Section 149(10) of the Companies Act, 2013.
- Views (3182)
- Posted By: Amish 12 year(s) ago
|
Please refer to the rules related to the appointment of an Independent Director i.e.Rule No. 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Q
Read More
Please refer to the rules related to the appointment of an Independent Director i.e.Rule No. 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 the proviso provided that any intermittent vacancy of an ID shall be filled-up not later than immediate BM or 3 months from the date of such vacancy, whichever is later. Now if we got to Schedule IV ("Code for Independent Director") VI. Resignation and removal: Point 2. it has been provided that the ID vacancy shall be filled up within 180 days from the date of removal or such resignation. Please clarify within how many days the vacancy of ID should be filled-up
- Views (3536)
- Posted By: Pradeep chugh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4910)
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3851)
- Posted By: Anjali 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4248)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3441)
- Posted By: Ashutosh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3601)
- Posted By: Haryana 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3818)
- Posted By: Meenakshi sharma 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3410)
- Posted By: Mitesh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2995)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3343)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
Regarding appointment of Independent Director under section 149 (4) of Co. Act 2013 read with Rules 4 of The Companies (Appointme
Read More
Regarding appointment of Independent Director under section 149 (4) of Co. Act 2013 read with Rules 4 of The Companies (Appointment & Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 provides that the following class or classes of companies shall have latest two Directors as independent Directors on the Board of Directors of the Company (iii) a public company which have, in aggregate of, outstanding Loans, debentures and deposits, exceeding fifty crores rupees In this regard please clarify the following : 01. What is meaning of “Outstanding loans” i.e. both short term and long term loans both or Else ? 02. For the purpose of this rules it is stated that, the paid up share capital or turnover or outstanding loans, debentures and deposits, as the case may be as existing on the last date of latest audited financial statements shall be taken into account then : Please clarify which date i. e. date of balance-sheet as on 31st March or date of signing of Balance-sheet of that year ?
- Views (4510)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4075)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3666)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3378)
- Posted By: Ajith 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3633)
- Posted By: Joy kumar jain 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3912)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3409)
- Posted By: Sandeep 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3461)
- Posted By: Pritesh gangwal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3283)
- Posted By: Ranjal laxmana shenoy 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3474)
- Posted By: Ranjal laxmana shenoy 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3147)
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2959)
- Posted By: Amod kumar jha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3914)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3292)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (3068)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 12 year(s) ago
|
We have incorporated a company with 5 lacs authorised capital in October 2013 with 2 individuals as subscribers to MOA. One indiv
Read More
We have incorporated a company with 5 lacs authorised capital in October 2013 with 2 individuals as subscribers to MOA. One individual is Indian resident subscribed for 1 share and the other is a foreign national [who is staying in india for the past 4years] who subscribed for 499 shares of rs.1000 each. Later, the parent company remitted 483000 towards share applicaation money and were allotted 483 shares. Authorised capital increased to 10 lacs also. 1 share is allotted to indian resident on receipt of money but no shares are allotted to foreign national. The FC GPR is filed with RBI. Now RBI is asking why the company has not allotted shares to foreign national when he agreed to subscribe for 499 shares in MOA? My question is it compulsory for company to allot shares to the subscribers to MOA before alloting to external investors. What section in companies act provides this? Company has closed its financial year ending 31st March 2013 and filed Annual compliances with ROC. Kindly suggest
- Views (2729)
- Posted By: Aravind 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1853)
- Posted By: Akhand 11 year(s) ago
|
1. Will ‘loan from own shareholders taken by a private limited nbfc’ come under the definition of Public Fund as per RBI Circ
Read More
1. Will ‘loan from own shareholders taken by a private limited nbfc’ come under the definition of Public Fund as per RBI Circular dated 01.09.2016 vide chapter II point 3 (xxv), though deposit/loan from own shareholders is not regarded “Public Deposit” and there is no outside fund, loan belongs to shareholders of company themselves.
2. Will ‘Overdraft against own Bank FDR taken by a private limited nbfc’ come under the definition of Public Fund/Bank finance as per RBI Circular dated 01.09.2016, whereas Bank FDR is not considered even as Financial Assets as per Rbi circular RBI/2011-12/446 DNBS (PD)CC.No.259 /03.02.59/2011-12 dated March 15, 2012 , since this Overdraft is only against NBFC’s own fund deposit as FDR to save interest, and there is no real Bank Finance, means any body can take Overdraft against FDR without going through any process as in other bank Finance, where one has to be understood of having character of three C’s i.e. Capability, Capacity and Character. In another words, If there is no FDR, there will be no overdraft, means no real Bank Finance.
3. Will loan from ‘Holding private limited NBFC’ to its ‘associate private limited NBFC’ and vice versa or ‘loan within group entities to one another’ come under ‘inter corporate deposit’ under Public Fund as per RBI Circular dated 01.09.2016, since in real sense there is no outside Public Fund is involved.
- Views (6519)
- Posted By: Pawan mittal 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1848)
- Posted By: Akhand 11 year(s) ago
|
|
This is regarding associate and subsidiary companies. As per new act even the loan given to subsidiary companie by its holding com
Read More
This is regarding associate and subsidiary companies. As per new act even the loan given to subsidiary companie by its holding companies are not exempt except in case of 100% subsidiaries. If a company holds the entire share capital of its subsidiary except one share ehich is held by one of the holding as well as subsidiary company's Director(all the Directors are same in both the companies) will it be treated as 1005 subsidiary or the one share must be held as a nominee by complying with the beneficial interest requirement to make it a 1005 subsidiary
- Views (1798)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
As per the proviso to sec 129(3) Subsidiary company included Associates Companies also. Further as per regulation 16 (1) (c ) of S
Read More
As per the proviso to sec 129(3) Subsidiary company included Associates Companies also. Further as per regulation 16 (1) (c ) of SEBI (Listing Obligations And Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 Definition “material subsidiary” which mean a subsidiary, whose income or net worth exceeds twenty percent of the consolidated income or net worth respectively, of the listed entity and its subsidiaries in the immediately preceding accounting year. So Does consolidated income or consolidated net worth mean consolidated income as per Section 129 (3) as per Companies Act 2013 or Consolidation is required for Holding and Subsidiary only Excluding Associates Company for the purpose of interpretation of regulation?
- Views (1481)
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (3859)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (9921)
- Posted By: Brajesh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4060)
- Posted By: Kishore chawla 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3313)
- Posted By: Nitin 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4105)
- Posted By: Pranay patel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5256)
- Posted By: Mihir panchmatya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3469)
- Posted By: Ca bhagyashree sathe 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4498)
- Posted By: Ananya gupta 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4732)
- Posted By: Manoj dhariwal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3678)
- Posted By: Nalin jain 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3403)
- Posted By: Animesh sharma 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4266)
- Posted By: Mohit kumar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3756)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3959)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3930)
- Posted By: Megha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (10493)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4029)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3644)
- Posted By: Arpitha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3678)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3659)
- Posted By: Ankit 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4382)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3691)
- Posted By: Bhoomika jain 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3377)
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1624)
- Posted By: Gokul rathi 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1793)
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (5340)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3784)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4118)
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4754)
- Posted By: Neha seth 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4150)
- Posted By: Hitender tanwar 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (7765)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4239)
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4050)
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4094)
- Posted By: Aishwarya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3919)
- Posted By: Mayank 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3238)
- Posted By: Vijay khera 10 year(s) ago
|
I want to incorporate a company with 3 directors, 2 of them are in Germany, How to get documents attested in this case.
And wha
Read More
I want to incorporate a company with 3 directors, 2 of them are in Germany, How to get documents attested in this case.
And what about INC-9 and INC-10, these are to be printed on stamp paper and requires notary, how to do it practically.
Please note: the two directors who are in Germany are residing there since last 10 months and they have all the documents like PAN, Aadhar, Driving Licence etc.
If someone has done this, please answer, its quite urgent.
- Views (3029)
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3337)
- Posted By: Nishit 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3298)
- Posted By: Secretarial monks 10 year(s) ago
|
A foreign body corporate incorporates a company in India as its wholly owned subsidiary. Incase of non-individual subscribers it
Read More
A foreign body corporate incorporates a company in India as its wholly owned subsidiary. Incase of non-individual subscribers it is mandatory to attach MOA and AOA apostilled in pdf in Inc-32 Spice.
But if the authorised signatory comes down to India for incorporating the company and if he signs in subscriber clause for the body corporate what would be position of "apostillation" can it be locally notarised like other proofs and documents, since no body is available abroad to do all the procedures and he should be present there too to get all done. He is in India with valid business visa. Can anybody help on this. Thanks in advance.
- Views (3018)
- Posted By: Akila 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3811)
- Posted By: Sumanta kumar dasgupta 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3140)
- Posted By: Vijay khera 10 year(s) ago
|
We have initiated the procedure for Incorporation of a company under Chapter XXI for Conversion (i.e. Vesting of Interest) of a Co
Read More
We have initiated the procedure for Incorporation of a company under Chapter XXI for Conversion (i.e. Vesting of Interest) of a Co operative Society into a limited Company. After filling INC-1, MCA clarified that Since the Rules are not clear in this context u/s 366 Part-1 of Chapter XXI of Companies Act,2013.The proposed name is not allowed, till further clarification in this matter.
Further we revived guidance from MCA to convert the Co operative Society into LLP and then Convert the LLP into a Limited Company.
So please guide us in this regard and kindly explain the procedure.
- Views (3462)
- Posted By: Kedar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3792)
- Posted By: Govind 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4757)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3042)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3822)
- Posted By: Akila 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3493)
- Posted By: Jitendra 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3783)
- Posted By: Suresh k s 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3291)
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3259)
- Posted By: Vimal chhabra 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3645)
- Posted By: Haryana 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3459)
- Posted By: Prakash khedekar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3109)
- Posted By: Sandhya 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3276)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4858)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3610)
- Posted By: Vinay b l 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2922)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4713)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3178)
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3301)
- Posted By: Mitesh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3422)
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3197)
- Posted By: Sushil kumar goyal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5292)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3232)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3087)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3357)
- Posted By: Ashok kumar verma 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3808)
- Posted By: Anjali 13 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3206)
- Posted By: Sumit dhawan 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4248)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3146)
- Posted By: Ankit kishore sinha 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3068)
- Posted By: Ankit kishore sinha 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3132)
- Posted By: Aishwarya 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3024)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3043)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3129)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2863)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2923)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2991)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3137)
- Posted By: Sashank 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3046)
- Posted By: Company secretary 11 year(s) ago
|
[CS_yahoogroups) PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW
Actions
C S GROUP 16:45PM Keep this message at the top of your inbo
Read More
[CS_yahoogroups) PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW
Actions
C S GROUP 16:45PM Keep this message at the top of your inbox Groups
To: C S GROUP
Sir/Madam,
Can anybody present the following matter before the "Company Law Committee"
One Co-operative society wants to get it registered as a Limited Company u/s 366 of the Companies Act 2013.
In this connection I went to ROC for discussion in relation to format of approval of majority of members of co-operative society and notice for such registration to be given by Co-operative society in News paper.
But ROC informed me that such registration under Part I of Chapter XXI has been stopped, since there is ambiguity in the Act and the rules notified for the said chapter.
ROC also informed me that there is an internal Order of Higher authorities for not registering such companies till further orders.
I think this is the problem in implementing the law.
You are requested to present before the Company Law Committee.
- Views (3880)
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2901)
- Posted By: Deepak 10 year(s) ago
|
Dear Experts,
One of my client running a proprietorship firm and possessing of land, building, plant and machinery in the propr
Read More
Dear Experts,
One of my client running a proprietorship firm and possessing of land, building, plant and machinery in the proprietor name and recently he has formed private limited company and having 50% of shares and remaining allotted to his wife and sons. Now my question is they wants to take over the proprietorship concern i.e. all assets and liability of the existing concern into private limited company. Whereas we have not mentioned these transaction in the object clause.
Can anyone provide the procedure to be followed without facing any consequences in future. and they wants to avoid the capital gain tax under income tax act.
Please share the step by step procedures.
- Views (3658)
- Posted By: Aishwarya 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2886)
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3205)
- Posted By: Amitesh ravi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2454)
- Posted By: Arjun 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3116)
- Posted By: Atul setu 9 month(s) ago
|
- Views (3050)
- Posted By: Atul setu 9 month(s) ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Views (2222)
- Posted By: Nilesh jain 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (7337)
- Posted By: Pritesh gangwal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1888)
- Posted By: Ashok 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2215)
- Posted By: Anil 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1698)
- Posted By: Siddhi 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1744)
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2062)
- Posted By: Nikki 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1792)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2002)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
A listed public company has passed resolution in Sept. 2010 for re-appointment of Managing Director for 5 years i.e (Sept. 2010 to
Read More
A listed public company has passed resolution in Sept. 2010 for re-appointment of Managing Director for 5 years i.e (Sept. 2010 to Sept. 2015) & their remuneration in Remuneration Committee, Board Meeting & Shareholders Meeting under the Companies Act, 1956. The Co. has obtained MCA approval for remuneration payment (5% of Profits) to MD year 2013-14 due to inadequate Profits. The Company has inadequate Profits in current year 2014-15 and required MCA approval. The Co. has not passed any resolution in Remuneration Committee, Board Meeting & Shareholders Meeting under the Companies Act, 2013 during the Year 2014-15. As per MCA Circular 32/2014 dated 23.07.2014 – Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956. It is clarified that resolutions approved or passed by companies under relevant applicable provisions of the old act during the period from 01st Sept, 2013 to 31st March 2014 can be implemented in accordance with provisions of old act, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provisions subject to the conditions a) That the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 01st April, 2014 and b) That this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one year from the passing of the resolution or 6 months from the commencement of the corresponding provision in new Act whichever is later. Now what are the options available to the company: 1. Apply to MCA for their approval on the basis of resolutions passed under the Old Act – The Companies act, 1956. Or 2. The company pass related resolutions in next AGM -2015 and apply to MCA after passing of resolutions for waiver of remuneration payment made to MD during the year 2014-15.
- Views (2256)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 12 year(s) ago
|
Payment of Managerial Remuneration A Unlisted Public Limited Company having no profit or inadequate profit want to appoint/re-ap
Read More
Payment of Managerial Remuneration A Unlisted Public Limited Company having no profit or inadequate profit want to appoint/re-appoint managing Director/WD and proposes to pay or revise remuneration which is less than Slab mentioned in Part (a) of section II of schedule V of companies Act, 2013. For Example (i) Effective capital is Negative or Less than 5 Crores and Limit under this slab is Rs. 30 Laks P.A.- In this case company propose to pay or revise remuneration of Rs. 25 Lacs P.A., So company need to pass ordinary Resolution. Please clearly that in this case is it compulsory for the company to approve the remuneration by Nomination and Remuneration committee ?
- Views (3440)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2098)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2012)
- Posted By: Company secretary 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3547)
- Posted By: K suresh babu 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2109)
- Posted By: Nirupama v 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2004)
- Posted By: Astha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1993)
- Posted By: Ashok 9 year(s) ago
|
|
|
|
- Views (7879)
- Posted By: Ravi arora 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (22055)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2473)
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2024)
- Posted By: Reena 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2738)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2186)
- Posted By: Anshul mittal 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2242)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1607)
- Posted By: M s ramachandran 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3480)
- Posted By: Sreenivasa rao 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1750)
- Posted By: Khushboo khatreja 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1888)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3499)
- Posted By: Rishi harlalka 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2319)
- Posted By: Anita 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3807)
- Posted By: Radhika 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2341)
- Posted By: Suresh 12 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2424)
- Posted By: Vishal arora 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2889)
- Posted By: R balasubramanian 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1787)
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2540)
- Posted By: Roshan 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2053)
- Posted By: Kamal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3198)
- Posted By: Viral sanghavi 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2073)
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3272)
- Posted By: Hardam singh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2126)
- Posted By: Debabrata 11 year(s) ago
|
|
| | | |