- Views (2089)
- Posted By: Ashok 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2844)
- Posted By: Ravi 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2538)
- Posted By: Reena 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2056)
- Posted By: Rahul srivastava 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1743)
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1585)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2070)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4956)
- Posted By: Govind 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1890)
- Posted By: Nandini 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2664)
- Posted By: Jitesh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1959)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1998)
- Posted By: Monali sharma 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1814)
- Posted By: Duttalahiri & co 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1595)
- Posted By: Kamlesh 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2253)
- Posted By: Latha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2249)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
In continuation on my query on appointment of auditors ok we hv to appoint the auditorss for a term of five years starting this yr
Read More
In continuation on my query on appointment of auditors ok we hv to appoint the auditorss for a term of five years starting this yr only in case of non prescribed companies and file ADT-1. But the form ADT-1 is not available for e filing we hv to attach it in GNL-2, Right? Further in ADT-1 there is mention of the period for which appointment is being made and no attachment has been prescribed. Is it not necessary to attach any letter given to auditors or intimation reced from auditors with the form? And if we file ADT-i every year which period we will specify the appointment is for--one financial year or the the remaining 4,3 or 2 financial years?
- Views (2324)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2590)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2330)
- Posted By: Reena 11 year(s) ago
|
Could you please clarify the following on the appointment of auditors please. We are private limited company having a paid up capi
Read More
Could you please clarify the following on the appointment of auditors please. We are private limited company having a paid up capital of less than 20 crores. The existing auditors have completed 3years. We need to re-appoint in the AGM for next term. The present act requires appointment at the Board +AGM for 5 years. The clarification are as follows: a) Is it mandatory we have to appoint auditors for next 5years. b) If so whether we have to appoint for next two consequent years since they have already completed 3 years or for complete term of next 5 years. c) Will it be in compliance if we appoint for every 1 year as per the erstwhile act of 1956. d) Is it possible to leverage of sec 139(2) wherein three years have given for compliance as it states appointment includes re-appointment? We look forward to your valuable inputs on the above.
- Views (1998)
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2624)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 11 year(s) ago
|
In new Form ADT-1, point no.(f) asks for the period of accounts for which appointed. In small companies where rotation is not appl
Read More
In new Form ADT-1, point no.(f) asks for the period of accounts for which appointed. In small companies where rotation is not applicable, we hv appointed auditors for five years.Now my query is -what should be entered in this column 01.04.2014-31.03.2015 or01.04.14 to 31.03.2019. The auditor is going to audit accounts of finacial year 14-15 only with this appointment for coming years ratification is needed as per law, but in resolution we r appointing them for five years.Further in next point g no of finacial year hv been asked for which the appointment is related but i think this column is meant for 139(2) companies only as it asks to fill point no.i before filling this point g.If smbody has filed the form pl. clarify
- Views (3101)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3023)
- Posted By: Latha 11 year(s) ago
|
This is a case of a company to which Sec 139(2) of CA 2013 is not applicable. The present audit firm of the company is appointed f
Read More
This is a case of a company to which Sec 139(2) of CA 2013 is not applicable. The present audit firm of the company is appointed for stat.audit since inception of the company (18 yrs). So the rotaion of auditors/firm under rule 6 is also not applicable. The tenure of the prev yrs held by the audit firm is 18 yrs though there could be 2 members of the same firm who have signed the auditor accounts over the past yrs. Form ADT 1 permits entry of only 10 yrs under pt no 4(i). Is there necessity to attach optional attachment for remaining 8 yrs?. Is the intent of law is only to seek the details of 10 yrs in case of audit firm as illustrated in rule 6 of the relevant rules?
- Views (2106)
- Posted By: Latha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2491)
- Posted By: Dhawal kant singh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1863)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
Internal Auditor -As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 such class of companies are required to appoint internal auditor
Read More
Internal Auditor -As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 such class of companies are required to appoint internal auditor who shall either be a chartered accountant (CA) or a cost accountant (CMA) or such other professional as may be decided by the board to conduct internal audit. As per rule 13 Explanation the internal auditor may or may not be an employee of the company. Please clarify following – 1) such other professional as may be decided by the board means an employee of the company M.com or LLB qualified may be the internal auditor. 2) An employee of the company CA Inter OR CMA Inter OR CS Inter may be the internal auditor. 3) An employee of the company CA, CMA or CS may be the internal auditor.
- Views (3107)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2097)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2305)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1602)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1802)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1984)
- Posted By: Prekshi gupta 11 year(s) ago
|
The appointment of statutory auditors require filing of Form ADT1 within 15 days of the AGM. The act permits appointment of statut
Read More
The appointment of statutory auditors require filing of Form ADT1 within 15 days of the AGM. The act permits appointment of statutory auditor for more than a year with ratification by shareholders at every AGM. Form ADT1 does not have field relating to the period for which the stat.auditor is appointed. However Form GNL2 to which ADT1 is to be attached has to be filled with financial year to which it applies. Should we state just one year that is the 1st yr or the entire tenure say 3 yrs or 5 yrs as the case may be in GNL2?. Should the ratification be followed by filing of ADT1 within 15 days every year for the whole tenure? Though a similar query is recently raised, I would like to have specific reply. Hence the query.
- Views (5492)
- Posted By: Latha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1668)
- Posted By: Kanika gupta 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1578)
- Posted By: Kanika gupta 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1851)
- Posted By: Akansha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2945)
- Posted By: Piyush 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1659)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1780)
- Posted By: Ravi 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1687)
- Posted By: Duttalahiri & co 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2400)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1752)
- Posted By: Anil 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1845)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2128)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1809)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1789)
- Posted By: Prerna 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1877)
- Posted By: Mohit kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2004)
- Posted By: Kamlesh g pandya 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3022)
- Posted By: K. madhusudhan reddy 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2217)
- Posted By: Nandini 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2125)
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1643)
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 9 year(s) ago
|
Dear Exerts,
XYZ is a Partnership Firm Auditor of a Listed Company for a period more than 15 years, but due to provisions of Rot
Read More
Dear Exerts,
XYZ is a Partnership Firm Auditor of a Listed Company for a period more than 15 years, but due to provisions of Rotation of Auditors XYZ will not be eligible to to reappointed for 5 Years.
Mr. Z a non signing of XYZ Firm resigned and Joined a new CA Firm ABC and ABC appointed as Auditor of That listed Company.
My question is that whether ABC can be appointed as Auditor of that Listed Company whose earlier auditor was XYZ ?
Whether Mr. Z who resigned my XYZ can sign Audit report of that listed company on behalf of New CA Firm ABC?
- Views (1415)
- Posted By: Nitin 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1908)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1238)
- Posted By: Neelam 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1547)
- Posted By: Gurpreet kaur 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2921)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
in a private limited company, Annual Filing of year 2014 is pending, the company has filed MGT-14 related to Adoption of Accounts
Read More
in a private limited company, Annual Filing of year 2014 is pending, the company has filed MGT-14 related to Adoption of Accounts, Directors report within due date. but the auditor has given his resignation on 31/03/2014 and practically the accounts are not audited on due date. Auditor's resignation is not yet filed to ROC. Now my question is if such casual vacancy of auditor is filled by appointing new auditor by the board which exceed 300 days, will it amounts to any other penalty or compounding other than Additional feed on such board resolution?
- Views (1648)
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1773)
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1759)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1611)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1669)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1854)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1710)
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1817)
- Posted By: Vivek mittal 10 year(s) ago
|
As for as my understanding to remove auditor company has to call for the board meeting and pass the resolution for removal of the
Read More
As for as my understanding to remove auditor company has to call for the board meeting and pass the resolution for removal of the auditor and file the form with the RD in the ADT 2 after approval of RD hold the general meeting and pass the special resolution and replace the auditor
But my question is under the provision of section 140 says "before taking any action reasonable opportunity should be given to the auditors". when the opportunity should be provided.
i have 2 stages where opportunity should have been given 1. in the board meeting (then what is the notice period). 2. in the GM (then what is use of Going to central govt if the shareholder does not remove such auditor inspire of RD approval).
please give your inputs on the same.
- Views (1755)
- Posted By: Naman 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1699)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1638)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1706)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1783)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1761)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2053)
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1557)
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1987)
- Posted By: Kaushik d nahar 11 year(s) ago
|