-
Reply
- Views (5851)
- Posted By: Ravinder 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (5329)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (7867)
- Posted By: Ravi arora 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (36645)
- Posted By: Som nath 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (7516)
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4366)
- Posted By: Latha 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3294)
- Posted By: Ashok 12 year(s) ago
|
A private company has husband and wife as only two directors as well as shareholders. There is no other shareholder. Husband is co
Read More
A private company has husband and wife as only two directors as well as shareholders. There is no other shareholder. Husband is continuing as a whole time director since 1996 as there was no fixed tenure in his appointment letter. The questions now are :1. Does the Company need to reappoint him with a tenure of 5 years now ? If yes, can he be reappointed now say. in December, 2014 or January, 2015 ? 2. Whether in respect of the Board resolution for his reappointment and remuneration, Section 184 and Section 188 apply ? 3. Will he compulsorily be treated as a KMP ? 4. Whether MR 1 in this case will be filed within 60 days from Board resolution or from General meeting resolution ( as the general meeting will now only be in September, 2015) ?
-
Reply
- Views (3284)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2857)
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2488)
- Posted By: Ruchi mitra 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2387)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (31009)
- Posted By: Vishal arora 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (22021)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (9433)
- Posted By: Sachin 7 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (7721)
- Posted By: Jasvir walia 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (5508)
- Posted By: Vishwas panjiar 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4179)
- Posted By: Ravi 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4038)
- Posted By: Vikas gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3772)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3619)
- Posted By: Anil 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3567)
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3492)
- Posted By: Jagdish singh rathore 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3429)
- Posted By: Sanjeev 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3165)
- Posted By: Monika bhardwaj 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3086)
- Posted By: Sunny bajaj 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2791)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2544)
- Posted By: Nava bharat ventures limited 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2527)
- Posted By: Gagandeep singh 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2213)
- Posted By: Nilesh jain 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (27759)
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (15639)
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (5793)
- Posted By: Deepti vohra 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (5408)
- Posted By: Zaeem 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4902)
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4748)
- Posted By: Neha seth 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4583)
- Posted By: Srinivasaraghavan 12 year(s) ago
|
The companies act states that preferential allotment shall also be treated as private placement and will have to comply with the r
Read More
The companies act states that preferential allotment shall also be treated as private placement and will have to comply with the requirements of private placements like issue of letter of offer, valuation by registered valuer etc. In case of preferential allotment of shares or other convertible securities to the promoters, should the company issue letter of offer and comply with the other requirements like valuation. With regard to the special resolution to be passed, can the company pass a single resolution with an upper limit so that the resolution can be used for all allotments to be made during the next 12 months. I understand that the special resolution should be acted upon within 12 months. Can a price band be fixed with power to the board to determine the price. In case of price band, how would the post issue shareholding pattern be made. Only when the exact price of share is known, can the number of shares to be alloted be determined. Please advice.
-
Reply
- Views (4560)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4556)
- Posted By: Piyush 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4251)
- Posted By: Vasant patel 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4246)
- Posted By: Aakanksha 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (4104)
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 13 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3969)
- Posted By: Venkatesh babu t r 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3864)
- Posted By: Palani kumar b 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3844)
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3763)
- Posted By: Reena 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3721)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
Please refer to the rules related to the appointment of an Independent Director i.e.Rule No. 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Q
Read More
Please refer to the rules related to the appointment of an Independent Director i.e.Rule No. 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 the proviso provided that any intermittent vacancy of an ID shall be filled-up not later than immediate BM or 3 months from the date of such vacancy, whichever is later. Now if we got to Schedule IV ("Code for Independent Director") VI. Resignation and removal: Point 2. it has been provided that the ID vacancy shall be filled up within 180 days from the date of removal or such resignation. Please clarify within how many days the vacancy of ID should be filled-up
-
Reply
- Views (3524)
- Posted By: Pradeep chugh 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3467)
- Posted By: Santosh pradhan 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3432)
- Posted By: Genicon 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3353)
- Posted By: Ravi 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3298)
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3242)
- Posted By: Rahul srivastava 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3217)
- Posted By: Himanshu 13 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3191)
- Posted By: Kamlesh 11 year(s) ago
|
Company “A” Limited has appointed as an additional director to fulfill the requirement of number of Independent Directors as requi
Read More
Company “A” Limited has appointed as an additional director to fulfill the requirement of number of Independent Directors as required under the Companies Act, 2013 and listing agreement with Stock Exchanges. The appointment of said additional director would be approved as an Independent Director in the next Annual General Meeting of the Company as required under section 150(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. In this connection the following queries are to be considered :- i) What will be the category of additional director for the intervening period i.e. from the date of appointment as an additional director till the next Annual General Meeting whether he will be independent or professional; ii) Whether the Board has power to appoint independent director and accordingly whether we can categorize such additional director as independent director in the Form DIR12 to be filed on appointment of directors; iii) If such additional director is to be treated as an independent director from the date of which he was appointed as an additional director then whether the intervening period from the date of appointment as an additional director till the next general meeting of the Company would be counted for the purpose of two terms of upto five consecutive years each as mentioned in Section 149(10) of the Companies Act, 2013.
-
Reply
- Views (3172)
- Posted By: Amish 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (3006)
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2965)
- Posted By: Latha 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2943)
- Posted By: Namita 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2905)
- Posted By: Ravinder 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2847)
- Posted By: Kanika gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2802)
- Posted By: Varun 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2727)
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2704)
- Posted By: Akansha 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2684)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2653)
- Posted By: Anil 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2499)
- Posted By: Akansha 12 year(s) ago
|
Sir, A Private Company had passed a Board Resolution in 2011 (at the time of incorporation) to borrow upto Rs. 10.00 lakhs, when
Read More
Sir, A Private Company had passed a Board Resolution in 2011 (at the time of incorporation) to borrow upto Rs. 10.00 lakhs, when its paid up capital was Rs. 4.5 lakhs. The Board then increased its borrowing powers in August 2013 (while approving financial statements) to Rs. 2.00 crores as it thought of acquiring land for slightly re-aligning its objects (original objects were mining activity, for which applications were filed but approvals had not come, & so the Company decided to get into sand mining activity, by inserting those activities in the Main Object). Though the resolution was passed in Aug 2013 BM, the actual lending from the directors happened only in late September 2013, when the Sec. 185 has already got notified. Whether in this case, we can rely upon the old resolution of Aug 2013 passed by the Board would hold good OR we need to comply with new provisions?
-
Reply
- Views (2464)
- Posted By: Padmavathi k 13 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2462)
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2459)
- Posted By: Sandhya 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2451)
- Posted By: Ravinder 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2436)
- Posted By: Pranay patel 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2341)
- Posted By: Kamlsh tripathi 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2328)
- Posted By: Anita 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2252)
- Posted By: Alok srivastava 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2248)
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2231)
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2222)
- Posted By: T.r.chadha & co. 11 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2188)
- Posted By: Arun kumar 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2182)
- Posted By: Nidhi 12 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2181)
- Posted By: Pooja garg 10 year(s) ago
|
-
Reply
- Views (2175)
- Posted By: Anshul mittal 12 year(s) ago
|
|
|