Orders
(0)
News
(0)
Queries
(0)
No updates found in last 7 days.


Q & A

1888 Views 1 Ans

This is a case of a company to which Sec 139(2) of CA 2013 is not applicable. The present audit firm of the company is appointed for stat.audit since inception of the company (18 yrs). So the rotaion of auditors/firm under rule 6 is also not applicable. The tenure of the prev yrs held by the audit firm is 18 yrs though there could be 2 members of the same firm who have signed the auditor accounts over the past yrs. Form ADT 1 permits entry of only 10 yrs under pt no 4(i). Is there necessity to attach optional attachment for remaining 8 yrs?. Is the intent of law is only to seek the details of 10 yrs in case of audit firm as illustrated in rule 6 of the relevant rules?

Auditors

Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago

This question has been closed if you want to answer,you have to re-open.


    Akansha

Not required to furnish remaining 8 years information as per intent of law but it is good if you are attaching the same.

  • Comment
  •   Comment (0)
#
Scroll